Redundancy Issue

Post by **Catspaw** » Mon Sep 22, 2008 3:02 pm

What should be done about the current redundant redundancy issue that has popped up? Should it be dealt with severely?

KODY 105 · Post by **KODY 105** » Tue Sep 23, 2008 8:41 pm

I believe that we should wait and confirm and confirm the existence of said redundancy issue.

J-man · Post by **J-man** » Wed Sep 24, 2008 7:54 am

No, this is the padded room, where anything goes. And you know, this is the padded room, where anything goes. Anything goes in the padded room, remember?

(btw, this is the padded room, where anything goes. And anything goes in the padded room..)

(I'm having WAYYYY too much fun here guys! $\:D/$ )

KODY 105 · Post by **KODY 105** » Wed Sep 24, 2008 8:50 am

Just because this is the padded room and the padded room doesn't mean that we shouldn't wait and make absolutely sure this problem this problem exists.

But we should still wait and make sure that the said problem exists.