Nomic

[ric]

Monty made a very good point earlier about waiting to see how everyone else votes and then just voting against your own proposal, but there's no rule that says that strategy isn't allowed, so I agree with Moontide. So minichef's proposal passes. And I suggest whoever goes next proposes this rule: When one proposes a rule, he is required to explicitly state whether he approves or disapproves of said proposed rule.

[minichef]

Whose turn is it now?

[Monty]

Then the bill passes. The score is now:

Ric: -5+10=5, 5+(5*.1)=5.5=6
Minichef: -2+(306-291*.5)=7.5. -2+7.5=5.5, 5.5+(5.5*.1)=6.05=6
Monty: 23+10=33, 33+(33*.1)=36.3=36
Moontide: -3 (No change that would result in a change in integer.)

I am basing this off of the stated addendum to 202 regarding mail and computer games. (Referring to integers.) Please double check me if you want to!


It is my turn, so:

Proposed rule 307: The person or persons making a proposal, must express their vote, whether "Aye, or "Nay," within or directly after their proposal. As this is a fairly important rule, anyone who failed to do this would be fined 1 point.

Let's discuss! Oh, and I vote "Aye" on this proposal.

[Moontide]

Disagree with how you did your math, but I am to lazy to do it different. So I will go with how you did it.

I vote Aye.

[minichef]

I vote nay, because as seen in last proposals from me, I forget to state aye or nay.

[ric]

Um, whose turn is it?

[Monty]

You need to vote...

[ric]

Aye!

lol, and I'm back.

[Monty]

Welcome back, Ric! Minichef hasn't been on in a while, and the last I heard, she wasn't coming back. We might need to find someone to take her place. But for now, the bill passes!

Ric: 6+(6*.1)=6.6=7
Minichef: 6+10=16. 16+(16*.1)=17.6=18
Monty: 36+((307-291)*(.75))=48. 48*(48*.1)=52.8=53
Moontide: -3 (Again, no change that would have resulted in a change in integer.)

I will try to contact Minichef and see if she still has interest in this. If not, I think Mark Prescott wanted in.

Moontide, it is your turn.

[Moontide]

I propose a new rule:

If a player fails to do any action that they need to do (for example voting) for 4 days, then they stop existing, until they post again.

[Agent 86]

if minichef isn't coming back and you need another player I guess I could try my hand at this

[Monty]

Minichef has indicated to me in real life that she will not be returning to the ToO. As the rules do not bar the substitution of players, AIOluver, you are now in and we need to vote. I vote Aye on this proposal.

[Agent 86]

I vote Nay

[Whitty Whit]

This may mess up the balance, but may I join?

[Moontide]

I think so, per rule:

116. Whatever is not prohibited or regulated by a rule is permitted and unregulated, with the sole exception of changing the rules, which is permitted only when a rule or set of rules explicitly or implicitly permits it.

[ric]

Ya, that's fine, I think.

So...where were we again?

[Monty]

Vote on Moontide's proposed rule: If a player fails to do any action that they need to do (for example voting) for 4 days, then they stop existing, until they post again. There is one vote for the proposal, one vote against. Moontide will be fined for not stating an "Aye" in the proposal, and you and Whitty Whit need to vote.

[ric]

This proposal is good, because otherwise, we're just waiting around until somebody gets back from vacation so they can cast the final vote (eg, me). So I vote aye.

[Whitty Whit]

I like this idea, it won't mess up the time of the game as much.

Vote : Aye

[Agent 86]

I Vote: Nay