Nomic
The game of rules, backstabbing, and a race to victory!
Oh, yeah, is it possible to change that to say, "On a players turn, the player's points increase by positive %10. If the player has negative points, %10 of that number multiplied by -1 is the players income for that turn."montywhittakerIII wrote:I feel a need to vote "Nay," because of the confusion when taking into account negative numbers. And, whenever I read your proposal, it seems as if you want to give every player an extra 10%, every time a rule is proposed.
If not, are we just going to interpret my rule to mean that? Because if not, everyone should have had a %10 increase last after my rule passed.
I don't think so.Oh. Are we allowed to pass and take money or something of this nature?
They did.ric wrote: If not, are we just going to interpret my rule to mean that? Because if not, everyone should have had a %10 increase last after my rule passed.
- minichef
- Pink forever!
- Posts: 378
- Joined: February 2011
- Location: School, friends house, my house or mall
Okay, I would like to propose that we make a rule to where we are allowed to pass a turn, and recieve 1 point. I am not sure which section this would go in, or if this is a good points amount, so I am open to help and point suggestions.
- Monty
- A great mapmaker
- Posts: 2807
- Joined: January 2011
- Location: Right in front of you! Puzzle that one through.
We might have to invoke judgment on this one, but, Minichef, you had previously never voted "Aye" on this proposal. As of right now, I am choosing to fail this proposal. I need a second opinion though. I thought the consensus after last time was that you needed to express your "Aye" when you made your proposal.
It's been awhile, hasn't it?
No, the consensus after last time was that you did not need to express your "Aye" when you made your proposal.
See http://thetoo.com/viewtopic.php?p=938993#p938993.
I said one did need to.
You said one didn't need to.
Ric said one didn't need to.
So I dropped the point because I didn't care that much.
There for, I think, the consensus is that one does not need to.
See http://thetoo.com/viewtopic.php?p=938993#p938993.
I said one did need to.
You said one didn't need to.
Ric said one didn't need to.
So I dropped the point because I didn't care that much.
There for, I think, the consensus is that one does not need to.
This one didn't: http://thetoo.com/viewtopic.php?p=940576#p940576
The aye is optional, the only reason I say it is because then we don't have this problem.
The aye is optional, the only reason I say it is because then we don't have this problem.
- Monty
- A great mapmaker
- Posts: 2807
- Joined: January 2011
- Location: Right in front of you! Puzzle that one through.
Actually, it can be a calculated strategy to vote Nay on your own proposal. For instance, had I voted Nay on my proposal that passed, I would have netted myself an extra 10 points. This is why we can't take unstated votes. In the proposal Minichef made that apparently set a precedent, she said "I think we should." If we make this decision, it limits the strategic play in this game.
It's been awhile, hasn't it?
- Mark Prescott
- Still standing tall
- Posts: 1349
- Joined: March 2010