Objection to the Bank name change

[bookworm]

When was the richest banker list reinstated?

April 30, 2015 as the last act of the Moosewood 2.0 administration.

[Moontide]

Now snubs has almost $4M dollars.

[SirWhit]

...How.

Just...how.

[bookworm]

Abuse of power. They haven't been hiding it.

[Jehoshaphat]

I object to the they in that sentence. There has only been one(that you know of) person who has abused their power. I cannot confirm nor deny any involvement in any such scandals or money laundering. To be honest, I am a little put out that I wasn't involved in any personal enrichment scams.

[Moontide]

Now snubs has almost $4M dollars.

Make that almost $5M dollars

[Knight Fisher]

When was the richest banker list reinstated?

April 30, 2015 as the last act of the Moosewood 2.0 administration.

That was over a year ago. O.o Though for historical record I do believe we did that and the Signature change the time before just to not leave any big headaches for whoever got stuck with the jobs after us. Well that and one last arbitrary use of power.

I Propose we change it to the original runner up. Obama's Bailout Bonanza.

[Dredge]

You all take things much too seriously. =p

You just withdrew, like, a million dollars from that thing.

[SirWhit]

...How is that relevant?

[bookworm]

You just withdrew, like, a million dollars from that thing.

Actually, no. You can only withdraw money from your own account. To amass this much she had to have just created it with admin power. Thus why it's a scandal.

[Dredge]

You just withdrew, like, a million dollars from that thing.

Actually, no. You can only withdraw money from your own account. To amass this much she had to have just created it with admin power. Thus why it's a scandal.

Is a deposition in order? I would hate to see this not happen because snubs can now push a campaign through at will, which defeats the purpose of setting ballot prices so doggone high.

[Bren]

Maybe she is setting herself up to overthrow Catspaw on the last day of our term.

[SirWhit]

You just withdrew, like, a million dollars from that thing.

Actually, no. You can only withdraw money from your own account. To amass this much she had to have just created it with admin power. Thus why it's a scandal.

Is a deposition in order? I would hate to see this not happen because snubs can now push a campaign through at will, which defeats the purpose of setting ballot prices so doggone high.

Plenty of other people have enough money to push through a campaign, why is that a problem? The people still have to vote them in. Should we ban people from having enough money to finance a campaign?

[Dredge]

"One man, one vote" is a Communist slogan, sir.

[SirWhit]

I fail to see your point, if there is only one person on the ballot there's still an option to vote no.

[Dredge]

I fail to see your point, if there is only one person on the ballot there's still an option to vote no.

However, people feel obligated to vote for the candidate due to "extra strain placed on Catspaw", as one member put it.

[Bren]

Strain? She appoints trustworthy mods and no events are run. Big deal.

[Dredge]

Strain? She appoints trustworthy mods and no events are run. Big deal.

"Their" words, not mine. I didn't say I agreed, I said there are people who said this during a particular election.

-- Sat Jun 18, 2016 11:44 pm --

Maybe she is setting herself up to overthrow Catspaw on the last day of our term.

Hmmmm.... That's gonna take some long, hard thought on my part.