I would argue that a wedding band is about as likely to make you sin as standing in a garage is likely to turn you into a car.
We, as flawed human creatures, look for excuses for our sinfulness. The answer, however, should be absurdly obvious: we choose to sin. The wedding ring didn't make us sin, the angry person yelling at us didn't make us sin, the low-cut top that someone wore didn't make us sin, we
chose to sin. Moreover, different things present different temptations to people: some people may be tempted to rage by engaging in arguments, others may be tempted to lust by certain clothing, etc but to make blanket rules and say that this morally neutral *thing* is objectively a potential temptation for everyone misses the point. This is why you get certain groups, which - with all due respect to OF1 and his denomination - take things to the extreme by ascribing sinful characteristics to a morally neutral object (wedding ring).
And while it is certainly good to eliminate those temptations in our life that may make it harder for us to resist sinfulness, we should never try to attribute the sinfulness to the behavior or the object when it is only ourselves that we have to blame for our final choices. Life will never be free of the occasion of sin, and perhaps our time is better spent taking responsibility for our actions, praying and resolving to resist temptation than trying to eliminate the potential for it in extremely obscure areas.
