Page 2 of 2

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:18 pm
by Agent3xq

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:21 pm
by uz
I don't think rach was exactly referring to that one when she made the post.... Xbox360 wasn't even out at that time. XD

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:23 pm
by Agent3xq
Right, but it is now and that's why the "bot" posted about it being out for 360

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:27 pm
by uz
my apologizes.... I was a little jumpy after the possible bot episode... Sorry for jumping the gun.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:48 am
by Raskolnikov
xiao wrote:ZOMG MARIENZ DONT USE that ZO IT MSUT NOT BE GUD!!111 DATS UNREALISTICCcc!!!!!11 Golly Gee Whilikers! I WANT 2 PLAY REAL LIEF IN A VIDEO GAME. The point of games is to give you stuff you can't do it real life. If you're playing life what fun is that?


Honestly, if the wargame is being set in a modern or historical setting, I prefer it to be as realistic as possible... The reason is, I don't really WANT to go blow somebodies head off in real life, but I want to have the experience of combat as close to real as I can WITHOUT actually being there. That's the fun of playing wargames, not the slash and dash, but the realism without it being real. I think it's boring to add in all the extra junk becuase it skews the battlefield in a sense. If I want to play an action or sci-fi or fantasy game, I want it to be in an action or sci-fi or fantasy world, not in a world with the 5th Marine Expeditionary unit, or the 3rd ID, or the 12 Cav, or the 82nd airborn. See?

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:13 am
by Agent3xq
UltimaZero wrote:my apologizes.... I was a little jumpy after the possible bot episode... Sorry for jumping the gun.


don't worry about it :D

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:49 am
by uz
Raskolnikov wrote:
xiao wrote:ZOMG MARIENZ DONT USE that ZO IT MSUT NOT BE GUD!!111 DATS UNREALISTICCcc!!!!!11 Golly Gee Whilikers! I WANT 2 PLAY REAL LIEF IN A VIDEO GAME. The point of games is to give you stuff you can't do it real life. If you're playing life what fun is that?


Honestly, if the wargame is being set in a modern or historical setting, I prefer it to be as realistic as possible... The reason is, I don't really WANT to go blow somebodies head off in real life, but I want to have the experience of combat as close to real as I can WITHOUT actually being there. That's the fun of playing wargames, not the slash and dash, but the realism without it being real. I think it's boring to add in all the extra junk becuase it skews the battlefield in a sense. If I want to play an action or sci-fi or fantasy game, I want it to be in an action or sci-fi or fantasy world, not in a world with the 5th Marine Expeditionary unit, or the 3rd ID, or the 12 Cav, or the 82nd airborn. See?


Then wargames are not for u. ;)

Play something role playish.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:14 pm
by xiao
Eww, roleplay games.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 6:39 pm
by uz
xiao wrote:Eww, roleplay games.


Eww xiao What's up with RPG? ;)

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:22 pm
by Raskolnikov
UltimaZero wrote:
Raskolnikov wrote:
xiao wrote:ZOMG MARIENZ DONT USE that ZO IT MSUT NOT BE GUD!!111 DATS UNREALISTICCcc!!!!!11 Golly Gee Whilikers! I WANT 2 PLAY REAL LIEF IN A VIDEO GAME. The point of games is to give you stuff you can't do it real life. If you're playing life what fun is that?


Honestly, if the wargame is being set in a modern or historical setting, I prefer it to be as realistic as possible... The reason is, I don't really WANT to go blow somebodies head off in real life, but I want to have the experience of combat as close to real as I can WITHOUT actually being there. That's the fun of playing wargames, not the slash and dash, but the realism without it being real. I think it's boring to add in all the extra junk becuase it skews the battlefield in a sense. If I want to play an action or sci-fi or fantasy game, I want it to be in an action or sci-fi or fantasy world, not in a world with the 5th Marine Expeditionary unit, or the 3rd ID, or the 12 Cav, or the 82nd airborn. See?


Then wargames are not for u. ;)

Play something role playish.


Ummm... you're being sarcastic, right? :anxious:

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:04 pm
by Oba-rai
When I scanned the title of the topic, I thought it said Battlefront II. Because I've played that on PS2 ... and it was pretty wicked sweet.
But yeah, I don't belong here! :x I am not 1337 like those who have their own game systems.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:31 pm
by Shad Lexer
Sure you are, just minus the game system. ;)

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:21 pm
by xiao
UltimaZero wrote:
xiao wrote:Eww, roleplay games.


Eww xiao What's up with RPG? ;)


RPGs are bleh.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:30 pm
by Oba-rai
GEAAARS OF WAAARR! Xiao is Largo! SPOILERZ! :O

Shad Lexer wrote:Sure you are, just minus the game system. ;)

Which is like a writer minus fingers.

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:37 pm
by uz
xiao wrote:
UltimaZero wrote:
xiao wrote:Eww, roleplay games.


Eww xiao What's up with RPG? ;)


RPGs are bleh.


That's because Xiao is currently Gears addicted ;)

PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:39 pm
by Lord_Kappa
Helen Stoner wrote:
Shad Lexer wrote:Sure you are, just minus the game system. ;)

Which is like a writer minus fingers.


Dictation. (Or brain implants that put words onto screen when you think them.)

I don't belong here either but I wanted to echo Sarai's comment about Battlefront II, I haven't played it but I have the first one, and it's cool.

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:01 pm
by xiao
UltimaZero wrote:
xiao wrote:
UltimaZero wrote:
xiao wrote:Eww, roleplay games.


Eww xiao What's up with RPG? ;)


RPGs are bleh.


That's because Xiao is currently Gears addicted ;)

Let me mention that the best game ever made with an "RPG setting" in the traditional sense was not in fact an RPG, but rather, an action adventure game known as Zel....nope. Shadow of the Colossus.