Go green!

Holding God's creation dear, or "Mother Nature" cult?

At the Second Church of Odyssey you'll find different ways of expressing your beliefs, finding prayer support or being encouraged through regular devotionals.
User avatar
Samantha14
All That Is Sam.
All That Is Sam.
Posts: 833
Joined: November 2012
Location: Wandering.

Go green!

Post by Samantha14 »

GO GREEN! Holding God's creation dear, or "Mother Nature" cult?

Discuss.
merp.
User avatar
darcie
darcietastical
darcietastical
Posts: 7106
Joined: April 2006
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Post by darcie »

It's weird, because I come from a very earthy, liberal place in the world, so recycling and reducing waste and taking care of the Earth makes sense to me. I remember severe droughts in California when we had to limit showers and flushes. It would seem like we would want to take as much care of this gift we've been given as we can! I do not at all understand the people that don't want to conserve our planet. And I know this isn't everyone that comes from the view opposite mine, but it seems some people want to use up the planet to bring Jesus back sooner. :anxious:

So, in conclusion, climate change is a real thing and yes I have hugged trees. :D
"I know nothing about internet dating sites other than the ToO." - Baragon
User avatar
John Chrysostom
No way I broke the window
Posts: 3593
Joined: September 2007

Post by John Chrysostom »

I agree 100% with Darcie.

And personally I think it's shame that a lot of Christians have given up this issue or consider it a "liberal" issue. We are stewards of this planet and we're doing a terrible job.
User avatar
darcie
darcietastical
darcietastical
Posts: 7106
Joined: April 2006
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Post by darcie »

John Chrysostom wrote:...Christians have given up this issue or consider it a "liberal" issue.
Well, you know, if they like it, I have to hate it and vice versa. :-
"I know nothing about internet dating sites other than the ToO." - Baragon
User avatar
Christian A.
Animatronic
Posts: 1063
Joined: April 2011
Location: Copley, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Christian A. »

I actually agree with you guys on something, for once! :P I would call myself an "environmentalist," but I do separate myself from the "radical environmentalists." I believe that we as Christians definitely have a responsibility to take care of the planet God has given us. We've been given dominion over it, and while that means that we can use it as we see fit, that doesn't give us license to abuse it. Recycling and conserving are great things to do, as long as they are kept in the right perspective. Once you start calling the earth "Mother Earth" though, it may have become a problem, possibly leading to idolatry. We are always to worship the Creator over the creation and not put the creation on a higher pedestal than it deserves.
User avatar
jasonjannajerryjohn
I revere the admins
I revere the admins
Posts: 5561
Joined: July 2007
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by jasonjannajerryjohn »

We don't have unlimited resources, eventually we are going to run out of everything that we're using: from plastic to oil to paper. The planet itself will survive all of this, but we probably won't. We are on a crash course to destruction with all the waste we produce. Therefore yes, obviously, we should be environmentalists. For our own preservation. And maybe for the preservation of various other organisms. It's always a shame when something goes extinct.
Image
Peri: Do you mean the TARDIS is malfunctioning again?
The Doctor: Malfunctioning? [pause] Malfunctioning? MALFUNCTIONING!?
User avatar
John Chrysostom
No way I broke the window
Posts: 3593
Joined: September 2007

Post by John Chrysostom »

Okay, it seems like we're in general agreement that we need to be more environmentally friendly. What are some ways we can do that? Either personally or as a society?
User avatar
jasonjannajerryjohn
I revere the admins
I revere the admins
Posts: 5561
Joined: July 2007
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by jasonjannajerryjohn »

Recycling is a given, of course. But we can also encourage corporations to cut back on pollution, perhaps proportional taxes for how much air or general pollution they make.
Image
Peri: Do you mean the TARDIS is malfunctioning again?
The Doctor: Malfunctioning? [pause] Malfunctioning? MALFUNCTIONING!?
31899
No way I broke the window
Posts: 3613
Joined: February 2009
Location: how come you don't want me now

Post by 31899 »

Let's bring petroleum into the mixture and allow all the Albertans to organise a witch hunt \:D/
User avatar
Tea Ess
Animatronic
Posts: 1067
Joined: August 2012

Post by Tea Ess »

I also agree with what has been posted so far, especially with what Darcie said, possibly exempting climate change, depending on what she means by that. I'm not particularly educated on the subject, however, and I'm not prepared to offer reliable statistics and data. :/

How do we decide what "reasonable" pollution levels are? Obviously it would be nice to have the earth be free of 100% of pollutants, but that isn't feasible, and environmental laws and taxes stifle production and the economy.
"And the fire with all the strength it hath."
User avatar
John Chrysostom
No way I broke the window
Posts: 3593
Joined: September 2007

Post by John Chrysostom »

What would be acceptable pollution levels to you? And don't we have to be willing to give up some profit and efficiency for the environment? I mean are we really only interested in the bottom line?
User avatar
Tea Ess
Animatronic
Posts: 1067
Joined: August 2012

Post by Tea Ess »

Unfortunately I am not well researched enough in this to explain acceptable pollution levels from my opinion, which is why I asked. I hoped that someone who had studied this more would be able to make a case for certain pollutant levels and shed more light on the matter for me.

And, yes, I definitely think that some profit has to be sacrificed in order to protect the environment. What I want to stress is that restricting pollution does cut into profits, and at an exponential rate. I'm not claiming it would be better overall for America if these restrictions were not put into place, my point is that all environmental restrictions have a definite cost, and at some point this cost cannot be worth it.
"And the fire with all the strength it hath."
User avatar
jasonjannajerryjohn
I revere the admins
I revere the admins
Posts: 5561
Joined: July 2007
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by jasonjannajerryjohn »

I would say that acceptable pollution levels would be levels that we can live in, but acceptable is not necessarily even desirable because by that definition we could have junk all over the streets and the air barely breathable.
Image
Peri: Do you mean the TARDIS is malfunctioning again?
The Doctor: Malfunctioning? [pause] Malfunctioning? MALFUNCTIONING!?
User avatar
darcie
darcietastical
darcietastical
Posts: 7106
Joined: April 2006
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Post by darcie »

T.S. (myself) wrote:... possibly exempting climate change, depending on what she means by that. I'm not particularly educated on the subject, however, and I'm not prepared to offer reliable statistics and data. :/
I mean that the pollution of the environment has led to shifts in climate. Not "global warming" because this is a misnomer. The entire world is not getting warmer. The climate, however, is changing in a way that could lead to major disaster if not slowed. Again, I'm a liberal hippie. And I live in California. And I'm older than you, and the climate has changed in my lifetime. So there. :neener:
One recent article: http://news.sciencemag.org/2013/07/east ... le-thought
"I know nothing about internet dating sites other than the ToO." - Baragon
User avatar
EK
The Original EK
The Original EK
Posts: 18945
Joined: April 2005
Location: Not Canada.

Post by EK »

Yeah, we need to protect the earth and stop consuming. This is a fact.

...also, maybe this topic should be in Finneman's because... we should all talk about this. :)
User avatar
bookworm
ToO Historian
ToO Historian
Posts: 16248
Joined: July 2006
Contact:

Post by bookworm »

I’m all for conservation, but environmentalism makes me hate humanity.

Image
User avatar
Christian A.
Animatronic
Posts: 1063
Joined: April 2011
Location: Copley, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Christian A. »

](*,) I don't know that there has ever been a more appropriate time to use this emoticon.

This is what I mean when I say I'm somewhat okay with being called an environmentalist--but only somewhat, because of people like this, whom I would call the extremely radical environmentalists.
User avatar
John Chrysostom
No way I broke the window
Posts: 3593
Joined: September 2007

Post by John Chrysostom »

Could we take the video for what it is, extreme environmentalist doing something that isn't helpful? I mean the video itself said they were extremist.

Obviously mourning the death a tree doesn't help, what kind of conservation should we be engaged in bookworm?

Christian A. what actions should we be taking as people who are concerned about the environment, to a proper extent?

Everyone seems to be saying, oh these people have taken it too far we should never be like that. Well no duh, we shouldn't be like this video but what are some positive examples of what would be proper?
User avatar
Christian A.
Animatronic
Posts: 1063
Joined: April 2011
Location: Copley, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Christian A. »

I think many examples have already been listed. We do have a responsibility to actually care about the world God gave us, not just go about our days as if nothing should be done to preserve its welfare. Recycling, conservation of materials, keeping the areas that we own presentable, as well as those of any people we can help. I'm not educated enough to know what kinds of things the government can be doing to reduce pollution and such, but I think we as individuals can do small things every day that will go a long way.
User avatar
Stop Wooton' Around
Wooton rocks!
Wooton rocks!
Posts: 1682
Joined: August 2009
Location: College

Post by Stop Wooton' Around »

I think we are all in agreement in what we should do but actually doing it is an entirely different thing.

We love the idea until these environmental decisions start affecting our lives. There is a reason why America, being one of the largest polluters, did not sign an agreement to cut back our pollution. When we start to lose jobs because of stricter regulations, we start hollering for more domestic jobs. Why may I ask those of you who have a car don't drive an electric (assuming you don't). Well, its not cheap to buy and the battery disposal is expensive. Oil is still one of the most reliable energy sources we have, which is why we continue to use it.

I agree there are areas we need to conserve but there are areas I will not and neither will society as a whole because it is inconvenient or costly.
Image
Post Reply