Jesus Curses the Fig Tree...why?

At the Second Church of Odyssey you'll find different ways of expressing your beliefs, finding prayer support or being encouraged through regular devotionals.
Post Reply
User avatar
Stop Wooton' Around
Wooton rocks!
Wooton rocks!
Posts: 1682
Joined: August 2009
Location: College

Jesus Curses the Fig Tree...why?

Post by Stop Wooton' Around »

Okay, I was reading my devotions and I came across this portion of scripture:

Mark 11:12-14
On the following day, when they came from Bethany, he was hungry. And seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to see if he could find anything on it. When he came to it, he found nothing but leaves, for it was not the season for figs.* And he said to it, "May no one ever eat fruit from you again."
Now this is from the ESV, and I am wondering why Jesus cursed the tree. I guess I could draw some references to our lives in hour we need to produce fruit and not just leaves, which would make since if the tree was in season; however, it was not fig season. It's like getting apples from Tom Riley's farm in the Spring instead of the Fall.

What do you think of this portion of scripture? I know what Jesus does always has a purpose, I guess myself being a human is struggling to find the purpose.

*As I continued reading I found that Jesus uses the tree in an illustration, but I still don't get why he had to curse the tree to make his point about having faith in God.
Image
User avatar
Christian A.
Animatronic
Posts: 1063
Joined: April 2011
Location: Copley, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Christian A. »

I read a commentator once who said that the key is that the fig tree was "in leaf." Although this would have been early for fig season, it was still possible that a fig tree could have produced some fruit. And when Jesus saw the leaves from the distance, that was a sign that there should have been figs ready. So He was anticipating fruit because of outward indicators, but He found none. That's why He cursed it.

It's the same way with professing Christians. Some may give outward indications that they are saved, but when you dig deeper, oftentimes you can tell that there's no real fruit; the outside was just a cover-up for the deadness inside. I think that's the point Jesus was trying to get at. He wants us to be either hot or cold--bearing true fruit or bearing no fruit at all--but not lukewarm, somewhere in the middle.
User avatar
EvangelineWalker
I'm a teapot
Posts: 421
Joined: January 2006
Location: Normal

Post by EvangelineWalker »

This story never really made sense to me before, but that is a good explanation, Christian.

My philosophy professor really liked this story the fig tree for some reason. He was a former atheist who had converted to Judaism.
User avatar
Kait
Feminazi Extraordinaire
Posts: 4523
Joined: April 2007
Location: Washington

Post by Kait »

Jesus was hangry and the tree didn't have any food. Obviously the solution is to curse it. :noway:
Image
"Any aspect of your faith which you do not question, is the one which should be questioned most."
"I totally approve of toddlers getting married." -Continental Admiral (aka Baragon)
User avatar
Liz_Horton
Animatronic
Posts: 1032
Joined: April 2006
Contact:

Post by Liz_Horton »

Kait wrote:Jesus was hangry and the tree didn't have any food. Obviously the solution is to curse it. :noway:
That is my argument as well. I cursed a vending machine the other day for not giving me my snack, same idea.
Image
User avatar
jasonjannajerryjohn
I revere the admins
I revere the admins
Posts: 5561
Joined: July 2007
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by jasonjannajerryjohn »

Because the fig tree was gay. Obviously. Jesus hated dem gays.

For the serious answer, because it didn't actually happen and was written as a metaphor for Christians who don't show fruit as Christian said.
Last edited by jasonjannajerryjohn on Tue Aug 13, 2013 7:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Peri: Do you mean the TARDIS is malfunctioning again?
The Doctor: Malfunctioning? [pause] Malfunctioning? MALFUNCTIONING!?
User avatar
Christian A.
Animatronic
Posts: 1063
Joined: April 2011
Location: Copley, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Christian A. »

Haha, I was waiting for you to show up. :P But hey, at least you agree with my interpretation! \:D/
Last edited by Christian A. on Tue Aug 13, 2013 8:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jasonjannajerryjohn
I revere the admins
I revere the admins
Posts: 5561
Joined: July 2007
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by jasonjannajerryjohn »

Hey, I'm all for practicing what you preach and such. If you're going to believe something, you better practice it. That's why I respect anti-abortion people who adopt. Because a lack of abortions means more children in orphanages means more need for adoption. And thus if you're going to be anti-abortion, you need to practice what you preach and adopt children. It's like if you believe that eating meat is wrong because you don't want to harm animals, you can't be out there getting a steak.
Last edited by jasonjannajerryjohn on Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Peri: Do you mean the TARDIS is malfunctioning again?
The Doctor: Malfunctioning? [pause] Malfunctioning? MALFUNCTIONING!?
User avatar
Christian A.
Animatronic
Posts: 1063
Joined: April 2011
Location: Copley, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Christian A. »

I think there would be more anti-abortion people who adopt if it weren't so stinking expensive to adopt a kid. I know my family would be ready and willing to take on more kids if we had the financial ability. But, in one sense, you have a point. If we are so adamantly against killing babies, whatever cost that brings to the mother, we should be willing to adopt them at whatever cost that brings to us. I'll have to think about that.
User avatar
jasonjannajerryjohn
I revere the admins
I revere the admins
Posts: 5561
Joined: July 2007
Location: Classified
Contact:

Post by jasonjannajerryjohn »

Yeah, that is true, it is expensive. Kids are not cheap, you have to feed them and clothe them and spend time with them. You'll probably end up paying for amenities for them like cell phones and computers and video games.
Image
Peri: Do you mean the TARDIS is malfunctioning again?
The Doctor: Malfunctioning? [pause] Malfunctioning? MALFUNCTIONING!?
User avatar
EvangelineWalker
I'm a teapot
Posts: 421
Joined: January 2006
Location: Normal

Post by EvangelineWalker »

It also costs upfront to adopt a child. Can be $1000 from foster care, $10,000 for private adoption plus attorney fees. Then there are the background checks. A person or family can be denied just because it doesn't 'look' like they'd have enough money to raise a kid with the right 'quality of life'. My parents would have adopted except for this. And guess what? Despite financial difficulty, they have raised 3 girls and put them through college. Another one wouldn't have broke the bank. God has always come through for us.

There are other ways to 'practice what you preach' without adopting a child. For instance, helping a single mother watch her little girl while she is at work so she can afford to take care of her while the dad refuses to pay child support and is constantly in trouble with the law. (this is also a personal family story)
User avatar
jelly
A Truly Great Noob
A Truly Great Noob
Posts: 9278
Joined: May 2008
Location: Western Canada
Contact:

Post by jelly »

Image
Fallacy of false continuum. // bookworm
Any cupcake can be made holy through being baptized in the name of the Butter, the Vanilla and the Powdered Sugar. // Kait
User avatar
darcie
darcietastical
darcietastical
Posts: 7106
Joined: April 2006
Location: Northern California
Contact:

Post by darcie »

In response to Jelly's post:
Image
"I know nothing about internet dating sites other than the ToO." - Baragon
User avatar
Christian A.
Animatronic
Posts: 1063
Joined: April 2011
Location: Copley, Ohio
Contact:

Post by Christian A. »

EvangelineWalker wrote:It also costs upfront to adopt a child. Can be $1000 from foster care, $10,000 for private adoption plus attorney fees. Then there are the background checks. A person or family can be denied just because it doesn't 'look' like they'd have enough money to raise a kid with the right 'quality of life'.
^ This is what I was talking about, jjjj. Not the obvious expenses that automatically come with raising humans.
Post Reply