Listening to AIO in chronological order

Whit's wiping down the counter, Connie's mopping the floor, and the kids are sipping on their milkshakes. If you want to talk about Adventures in Odyssey the radio drama, this is the spot to do just that!
jddrock
Lurker
Posts: 6
Joined: March 2018

Listening to AIO in chronological order

Post by jddrock »

Hello everyone!

I decided in October of last year to attempt to listen to AIO in it's entirety in chronological order. I started that month and since then I've joined this forum. It's been interesting thus far! Is there anyone here who's tried or done this before? What was your experience like?
User avatar
Catspaw
Care Bear Admin
Care Bear Admin
Posts: 30428
Joined: April 2005
Location: Canada
Gender:

Post by Catspaw »

That's very cool! I'm sure I remember other people saying they have done (or at least started) doing this. I haven't, but it sounds like a great idea. :D
Image
jddrock
Lurker
Posts: 6
Joined: March 2018

Post by jddrock »

Cool beans! I've been following the AioWiki page that sorts them all into chronological order from the first audio drama Focus did to the last episode produced. I never knew before this that the AIO albums don't contain the episodes in the order they were released in. It's been pretty cool reading detailed facts, trivia, and goofs about each episode as I get to them. I'm currently up to episode #181 "It Takes Integrity." It may take me few years to complete my quest with 800+ episodes already produced and many more to come while I'm taking this journey. It's been fun though! The character and plot developments are excellent to experience this way.
User avatar
Parakeet
My posts are revolutionary
Posts: 381
Joined: December 2016
Location: A galaxy far, far away...

Post by Parakeet »

That sounds very interesting!
I've been meaning to do this, but I keep forgetting. Does the AIOC sort the albums chronologically?
Don't you
remember
the SNOWFLAKES.
jddrock
Lurker
Posts: 6
Joined: March 2018

Post by jddrock »

The AIOC does sort the albums chronologically. I use the page on aiowiki.com to sort the episodes manually though.
User avatar
NatetheGreat
Got Pancakes?
Posts: 4445
Joined: June 2005
Contact:

Post by NatetheGreat »

This sounds like a fun project. :) Does this mean you'll own all 800+ episodes by the end of this?
Image
User avatar
Calhoun07
Not as new
Posts: 48
Joined: March 2017
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Calhoun07 »

I am doing this. And I do plan on going through all 800+ episodes.

My experience is being rather bemused by the dated episodes. Castles and Crusades is so bad it's unintentionally funny. It's so far off the mark of how Dungeons and Dragons works I am dismayed more people didn't call the episode out for how inaccurate it is.

And the idea that Applesauce would be so coveted when stores can pretty much control everything in their store from something as powerful as a smart phone and it's not a closely guarded secret is quaint in retrospect.

There's also an episode about how George was mad about a dress Donna chose to wear and how it made all the boys think the wrong thoughts. In today's #metoo world, there's no way a woman would take being told she can't wear something because some guys around her can't control themselves. It's pretty much supporting the idea of victim blaming and that women who dress that way are "asking for it." Now, I realize nobody made the point Donna was asking for the negative attention but it was implied. It just illustrates how much the world has changed since then.

So far I am still on the Hal Smith episodes. I am also keeping up on my NPR shows like Wait Wait Don't Tell Me as I go through them and only listen to them on my commute to and from work. So it will be a while before I get to the current episodes, but I am looking forward to it. I just finished episode 197 tonight. Mortal Coil is coming up soon, and that was quite a powerful episode.

I think it's fun to experience it all in order again. And to wait anxiously for my favorite episodes to play, and not jump around. The only thing I didn't like was around the time they started the home videos and they recycled some of the older episodes, but that's a minor complaint.

And I am very much looking forward to hearing the episodes post Eugene's wedding. Back in the 90s when I listened to the show, that's when I stopped with the show. I've gotten back into it because of all the nostalgia I have for this franchise. And I really can't wait to hear what they do after the reboot. But I won't hear it until those episodes come up in chronological order!
jddrock
Lurker
Posts: 6
Joined: March 2018

Post by jddrock »

NatetheGreat wrote:Does this mean you'll own all 800+ episodes by the end of this?
Sadly, no. I am a subscriber to the OAC. Listening through the club did give me access to the Officer Harley episodes though. I haven't had to skip any because of that!
User avatar
Scientific Guy
Tallying up
Posts: 140
Joined: August 2017
Contact:

Post by Scientific Guy »

jddrock wrote:Cool beans! I've been following the AioWiki page that sorts them all into chronological order from the first audio drama Focus did to the last episode produced. I never knew before this that the AIO albums don't contain the episodes in the order they were released in.
Quick plug to AIOWiki, if I may: Adventures in Odyssey Wiki:Episode Dispersion.
I made a page that breaks down episodes and albums chronologically. Hope it helps!
Calhoun07 wrote:Castles and Crusades is so bad it's unintentionally funny. It's so far off the mark of how Dungeons and Dragons works I am dismayed more people didn't call the episode out for how inaccurate it is.
Look at Skyrim. Even if the two-parter didn't work for DnD, it still can be well applied to situations today.
Calhoun07 wrote:There's also an episode about how George was mad about a dress Donna chose to wear and how it made all the boys think the wrong thoughts.
I still agree with George and I think Focus does too.
User avatar
The Top Crusader
Hammer Bro
Hammer Bro
Posts: 22629
Joined: April 2005
Location: A drawbridge over a lava pit with an axe conveniently off to the side

Post by The Top Crusader »

Scientific Guy wrote:
Calhoun07 wrote:Castles and Crusades is so bad it's unintentionally funny. It's so far off the mark of how Dungeons and Dragons works I am dismayed more people didn't call the episode out for how inaccurate it is.
Look at Skyrim. Even if the two-parter didn't work for DnD, it still can be well applied to situations today.
I dunno, I don't see it. Castles and Cauldrens really was a strange episode--nothing like D&D nor like a modern game like Skyrim... because one is played at a table and the other is played on a screen. If anything C&C sounds like what Wonder World is supposed to be about... kids outside playing instead of playing video games or whatever.

I remember the early episodes taking oddly hard stances on things like video games and arcades, its just funny now seeing how video games have evolved and pretty much anything that would've been out there in the late 80's was utterly tame compared to some things today--and kids today will listen to those early Blackgaard episodes and have no clue what an arcade is, lol.
User avatar
Bob
Catspaw Rocks!
Posts: 705
Joined: September 2006
Location: The Metroplex
Gender:
Contact:

Post by Bob »

Well, I'm not sure that I agree, as far as FotF's video game stance goes. On all the occasions I can think of, it was shown as not being inherently wrong, but having the potential for misuse, a position that as far as I can tell FotF has consistently maintained from the beginning up to the present. Whenever a character (often Jimmy, but Isaac and Lawrence also come to mind) is embroiled in some trouble involving games, it's always something adjacent to or connected to it: spending all of their money at the arcade, or playing instead of doing work, or breaking a fast, or disobeying their parents, or using someone else's property without permission. They never say that gaming in and of itself in moderation is inherently wrong. Even Jason's experiment with arcade games in "Red Wagons and Pink Flamingos" is not explicitly condemned, in spite of Jack's apparent opposition to them, as they come to something of a compromise by the end. This stance is generally maintained in later episodes, from the episode that primarily focused on this issue ("Gloobers") up to the present day, where Matthew Parker and Barrett Jones are known for playing video games (any trouble arising from their overuse or misuse of them).

While it's true that arcades were associated with "villains" in the show, I think that has more to do with showing the villains' encouragement of a lack of moderation. In both the Blackgaard and Novacom arcs Whit was not primarily concerned with their arcade/video games -- the overall worldview, from the occult to bad content in Novacom programming, took center stage in those cases. We know it isn't a general distrust of technology since Whit himself runs arguably the most advanced "video games" around, via the Imagination Station and Room of Consequence. I think the contention here is primarily that they can be "mindless" (Whit's main objection to them, as Jack mentions) and prone to abuse, which are both true.

Regarding C&C, I think the objection is to the magic and references to other occult belief systems, which in fact D&D contained then and still does to this day, though admittedly it isn't expected to be acted out in the vivid detail that C&C depicts. It isn't the playing outside with swords that's the problem. You could say that a type of roleplaying, though again in moderation, is even promoted, in episodes like Wonderworld, Heat Wave, and in "Family Vacation" when Jimmy and the other kid play Bible heroes.
User avatar
The Top Crusader
Hammer Bro
Hammer Bro
Posts: 22629
Joined: April 2005
Location: A drawbridge over a lava pit with an axe conveniently off to the side

Post by The Top Crusader »

Bob wrote:
Regarding C&C, I think the objection is to the magic and references to other occult belief systems, which in fact D&D contained then and still does to this day, though admittedly it isn't expected to be acted out in the vivid detail that C&C depicts. It isn't the playing outside with swords that's the problem. You could say that a type of roleplaying, though again in moderation, is even promoted, in episodes like Wonderworld, Heat Wave, and in "Family Vacation" when Jimmy and the other kid play Bible heroes.
I've just never cared for fantasy so it's never been my thing, but I guess I've never really understood why there is a large segment of evangelical Christianity very against D&D, yet, while I'm sure some oppose both, they are usually okay with and flat out encourage Lord of the Rings and Narnia. I mean, yeah, there is some Christian message there, especially Narnia, but LOTR is much more vague and its just a big sword and sorcery epic.

Like if playing "Bible characters" is okay in Odyssey, would playing LOTR? If that's okay, then why not generic D&D guy?
User avatar
Bob
Catspaw Rocks!
Posts: 705
Joined: September 2006
Location: The Metroplex
Gender:
Contact:

Post by Bob »

The Top Crusader wrote:I mean, yeah, there is some Christian message there, especially Narnia, but LOTR is much more vague and its just a big sword and sorcery epic.
In both cases, I think the fact that the 'creator God' in the books are symbolic of or otherwise represent God is what helps push them over the edge into respectability with many people.

As far as 'sorcery'... it seems to be pretty clear that people can't just "do magic"; we don't see the hobbits running around "casting fireballs". In Lord of the Rings, magical things are frequently either evil or of some kind of divine origin or at least inspiration. Gandalf is described as a 'wizard', but practically speaking is more like an angel, and the Elves seem to be innately magical.

Narnia is similar, but with even fewer exceptions, and I suspect given that its characters and plot are very obviously made to be analogous to Scripture, people are more inclined to give it leeway anyway.
User avatar
Calhoun07
Not as new
Posts: 48
Joined: March 2017
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Calhoun07 »

It amazes me that people are still debating if the "occult" is part of Dungeons and Dragons to this day.

There's nothing "occult" about it. It's just simple rolls of dice to determine if you can defend yourself or not or how you progress in the game. There's no "magic" behind it.

If you don't want to play it, then that's cool. But when the vast majority of people who never actually played it put it down, I just shake my head.

And, fun fact: Gary Gygax, co-creator of the game, was a Christian and a Christian to the day he died.

I could say more but I will just leave this here...
http://www.fansforchrist.org/new/articl ... cle03a.htm
User avatar
Monty_Whittaker
My posts are revolutionary
Posts: 388
Joined: September 2016
Location: Tatsumi Port Island
Status: The game begins.

Post by Monty_Whittaker »

Yeah, that is dumb, Castles and Cauldrons was a horrible episode that didn't reflect anything, not Skyrim(I've played it so I would know) and not D&D.
Resident JRPG nut
User avatar
Calhoun07
Not as new
Posts: 48
Joined: March 2017
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Calhoun07 »

Monty_Whittaker wrote:Yeah, that is dumb, Castles and Cauldrons was a horrible episode that didn't reflect anything, not Skyrim(I've played it so I would know) and not D&D.
There were so many strange things about it...

Obviously the show was FOTF's way of taking a dig at Dungeons and Dragons. It was that way by design. So much fear mongering in that time period about Satanic rituals and demonic games... To me, the episode was more to push an agenda instead of teaching a valuable moral lesson.

Then when Whit has his Obi-Wan moment and "feels" something bad happened (like Obi-Wan did when Alderaan was destroyed in Star Wars) when Jimmy decides to play the game.

The idea that the game players could actually summon real evil spirits, too. Just...odd.

Not the worst episode of all of them (really? Over Caroling, Caroling?) but the one that, to me at least, was a fairly weak story.

But you have to chalk it up for all the unintentional humor of it. I laughed out loud several times listening to it.
User avatar
bookworm
ToO Historian
ToO Historian
Posts: 16248
Joined: July 2006
Contact:

Post by bookworm »

Calhoun07 wrote:The idea that the game players could actually summon real evil spirits, too. Just...odd.
While I agree C&C is a bizarre episode that is just cringy today, as was the baseless D&D panic of the time, this particular part I think I actually get. I think it's similar to the opposition to things like spirit boards, where it's not because of belief the actual thing itself can do anything, but a concern that engaging in that behavior or mindset makes an individual more susceptible to demonic influence.
Image
User avatar
The Top Crusader
Hammer Bro
Hammer Bro
Posts: 22629
Joined: April 2005
Location: A drawbridge over a lava pit with an axe conveniently off to the side

Post by The Top Crusader »

It was also creepy because by this point Jimmy was like an older kid and his dad is just hanging around in the bathroom while Jimmy takes a bath and they have a discussion.

I dunno, that wasn't common place in my house. >_>
User avatar
Calhoun07
Not as new
Posts: 48
Joined: March 2017
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by Calhoun07 »

bookworm wrote:
Calhoun07 wrote:The idea that the game players could actually summon real evil spirits, too. Just...odd.
While I agree C&C is a bizarre episode that is just cringy today, as was the baseless D&D panic of the time, this particular part I think I actually get. I think it's similar to the opposition to things like spirit boards, where it's not because of belief the actual thing itself can do anything, but a concern that engaging in that behavior or mindset makes an individual more susceptible to demonic influence.

The "spirit boards" are also fake. Like the Ouija Board. It was invented by the Parker Brothers. It's not based on some occultish thing.

Ever actually use one? There's always one in the group that is pushing the pointer to where they want it. Nothing demonic about it.

I would never use one, but because it's lame and stupid. Nothing about making people susceptible to "demonic influence."

Any stories about demonic influence from people using it is as fake as Mike Warnke testimony.
User avatar
The Top Crusader
Hammer Bro
Hammer Bro
Posts: 22629
Joined: April 2005
Location: A drawbridge over a lava pit with an axe conveniently off to the side

Post by The Top Crusader »

Calhoun07 wrote:
Any stories about demonic influence from people using it is as fake as Mike Warnke testimony.
It's a shame he didn't stick to stand-up instead of being the architect for everything we [thought we] knew about Satanism in the 1980's--he was actually really funny!
Post Reply