Actually, I think that's more of a nod to the roles of women in the church, and there's a difference between church and government. It seems to me like you're almost implying that it's sinful for women to be in leadership roles, AE--probably not what you intended, but that's what it's coming across as to me.American Eagle wrote:Hmm. Ever heard of the roles of men and women? There's a reason why God set up male kings, and chose male disciples, elders and bishops. Woman are the help-meet of a man, and shouldn't lead other men unless there is no man to lead (case in point, Deborah).Batman wrote:....why? o_O;American Eagle wrote:I couldn't vote for a woman, honestly, unless there were absolutely no men capable.
Also, I think Eugene Kendall will more than likely be over in afghanistan in 2012 :/ not being in the US would surely hinder his chances of getting the nomination. Robert Downey Jr. is a good substitute tough.
If I could vote, it wouldn't be based on gender or race, however--it would be who would do best at the job.
I'm honestly not sure how I stand on the political roles, though I agree in general to what you're saying. I'm hoping a huge flame war doesn't break out though.. [/quote]